3 ms·

The article does briefly discuss a slightly more accurate version of that definition, and why it's bad (it's convoluted and relies on the poorly-defined kilogra

by sesqu 8y ago

The article does briefly discuss a slightly more accurate version of that definition, and why it's bad (it's convoluted and relies on the poorly-defined kilogram).

zaarn 8y ago
The kilogram will get a better definition this year if nothing holds it up (atleast, redefining it based on the planck's constant is planned for the 2018 meeting according to WP).
- SamBam 8y ago
  Right, that's a main point of the article.