4 ms·
You might be factually correct, but you are misunderstanding the point of the parent poster. What makewavesnotwar is saying is simply that making exaggerated ar
by poulsbohemian 8y ago
You might be factually correct, but you are misunderstanding the point of the parent poster. What makewavesnotwar is saying is simply that making exaggerated arguments for this technology in the name of making us safer is not a sufficient reason to introduce the technology. Perhaps if they had used larger numbers like 50 MPH relative to 60MPH that point would have been made clearer.
- Strongerpass 8y agoI understood the point well and I agreed with the poster. But in my view, if you are going to argue that we don't need more automated monitoring in traffic then claiming that speed has little impact on fatalities seems quite weird.
- compcoffee 8y ago>Perhaps if they had used larger numbers like 50 MPH relative to 60MPH that point would have been made clearer. If there's no difference between 30 and 40, 40 and 50, 50 and 60...then I suppose there's no difference between 30 and 60?