Carbon Engineering should be focusing on capture and sequestration, not this synthesized fuel BS. Air-To-fuel is not and will never be their moneymaker. The sy

Carbon Engineering should be focusing on capture and sequestration, not this synthesized fuel BS. Air-To-fuel is not and will never be their moneymaker. The synthesized fuel is not in demand and probably was thought of by a board member who heard of the word "value add" for the first time. The ONLY in-demand product of CCapture is the CO2 itself - whether it's the gov. who pays for it to be sequestered or an O&G company who pays for it to be used in enhanced recovery. Even the O&G demand is insignificant compared to the amount of money they'll get in sequestration contracts from the government, or by proxy, the FF producers who'll be required to implement them on site. It's important to note CCS is required to meet emissions targets - so I hope CE doesn't get distracted with less important/profitable goals.