> Because nothing requires them to explain what happened. Actually that's the point of discovery in a lawsuit, and discovery absolutely compels both New York a

> Because nothing requires them to explain what happened. Actually that's the point of discovery in a lawsuit, and discovery absolutely compels both New York and Ancestry to provide explanations via evidence. So you managed to be wrong on multiple accounts in a single sentence. You keep talking about "evidence". The point of discovery in a lawsuit is to discover evidence of wrong-doing.