The second page of that article was really disappointing. It's as if the guy never heard of Reddit. Calling Twitter digg's true nemesis is so far out of it is n

The second page of that article was really disappointing. It's as if the guy never heard of Reddit. Calling Twitter digg's true nemesis is so far out of it is not even funny. Twitter and Digg could coexist for ever. how can I get a real discussion of a link of twitter? It would be really hard for me to see the diverse amount of links that digg and reddit give me just by amassing a ton of friends. Most of the best links I've found on digg/reddit aren't even from people I would have know. They are not usually famous or popular outside those sites. Digg's error was shifting away from this and trying to go towards twitter's way of following a select group of people. That obviously is not what people want. Reddit does it by subjects, that seems to be working great.