I’m curious how the internal meeting (at the newspaper) goes, when they have no actual proof, such as an actual compromised device. How could you possibly publi

I’m curious how the internal meeting (at the newspaper) goes, when they have no actual proof, such as an actual compromised device. How could you possibly publish such a huge/important story without that smoking gun? We live in too much of a scientific/fact driven period of time to allow this to be taken seriously in my opinion.