3 ms·
I'm sorry but your comment and the post you link to is complete nonsense economically and worse applied to Keynes and Friedman is utterly wrong. The article you
by nickik 8y ago
I'm sorry but your comment and the post you link to is complete nonsense economically and worse applied to Keynes and Friedman is utterly wrong. The article you linked is an honestly an embarrassment.
Furthermore nothing in the actual economics of either of these two people puts them squarely in the supply-side/demand-side 'camp' and furthermore those terms are used competently wrongly to the point of meaninglessness in public discussion anyway.
I don't want to get into a long post here, but your way oversimplifying the issue economist discuss to a point where it borders on satire.
To get a somewhat better understanding in a short time:
- https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/KeynesianEconomics.html https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/KeynesianEconomics.html (written by Alan S. Blinder)
If you are further interested in the history of economists long dead, consider:
- https://www.mruniversity.com/courses/great-economists-classical-economics-and-its-forerunners https://www.mruniversity.com/courses/great-economists-classi...
- zackmorris 8y agoSo you're a Friedman fan I take it? ducks
- nickik 8y agoI'm a fan of R. G. Hawtrey