>for prioritizing social pacification over software quality. Well quite literally it's doing the opposite. Social derisiveness does nothing for the community.

>for prioritizing social pacification over software quality. Well quite literally it's doing the opposite. Social derisiveness does nothing for the community. That's just one example of many. And of course you had to nitpick about systemd instead of understanding what's being discussed. Missing The Point (TM) 2018. Linux itself isn't really a good example of sane kernel development and architecture. It's popular and it works.