Something to eat is __better__ than nothing. You keep reducing The World to The US and it's not the same thing. Many, many people in the world starved in terms

Something to eat is __better__ than nothing. You keep reducing The World to The US and it's not the same thing. Many, many people in the world starved in terms of vitamins and other nutrients, and they just fill their body with rice or corn floor. Which is just shy of dying from starvation, and put any body in the brink of the death at the minimal illness. In those cases, almost any increase in the quantity of food different from rice or floor is beneficial. Suddenly, millions of people could add carrots, tomatoes, oranges, pepper... to their monotonic diet, for the same or even less money. Yes, billions of people are eating __better__ than 30 years ago. But you insist this is wrong because some people in the US cannot shut their mouth and somehow are forced to eat beef in buckets. Please, explain me how this is related to people starving in Africa 20-30 years ago, or if you are saying thantobesity is a problem there.