3 ms·
The only questions I've seen constantly outdated are web dev related. More stable technologies like C/C++/python seem to have up to date answers most of the tim
by umvi 8y ago
The only questions I've seen constantly outdated are web dev related. More stable technologies like C/C++/python seem to have up to date answers most of the time (purely anecdotal).
- cdoxsey 8y agoLately I've been working with c++ and, at least in my experience, as a developer who's native tongue isn't c++, many of the answers have failed to keep up with the radical changes in the language in the last 10 years. Post-17 C++ is completely different from pre-11 C++. That said there's usually an answer further down the page with a more up to date solution, it's just not the accepted or most popular one.
- umvi 8y agoTrue, but consider your user base. I, for one, maintain legacy C/C++98 code. C++17 answers are not helpful to me because the legacy system does not have a new enough compiler, sysroot, etc for me to take advantage of them. It's not like web development where users' browsers auto-update and you can start immediately using the newest versions of everything. Only our newest projects are using modern C++ (14). I would wager the majority of C++ users "in the field" are using 11 and below and haven't had a good opportunity to switch to 14 or 17 yet. As such, answers that seem outdated to you may be a good fit for the majority. It's sort of like how any native answers automatically float higher than boost answers - why is this? Because most c++ users are not using boost and have no interest in using boost.