3 ms·
It is very disturbing for me to see Greg KH being at the top and deciding what goes into Linux. There is history of agenda that doesn't align best with kernel u
by binaryapparatus 8y ago
It is very disturbing for me to see Greg KH being at the top and deciding what goes into Linux. There is history of agenda that doesn't align best with kernel user interests. Can't forget d-bus events very related to this person. I did switch to FreeBSD couple of years ago but I love linux and it is not easiest to observe all the latest events.
- cesarb 8y agoGreg KH already decides what goes into the "stable" Linux series (4.y.z, for instance 4.18.15), which is what most people actually use. Besides, he assumed after the 4.19 merge window, and he's handed the 4.20 merge window back to Linus; it's in the merge window that new features come in (after the merge window closes it's mostly only bugfixes), so it's still Linus who gets to decide.
- binaryapparatus 8y agoIs stable different from latest? I am not sure how much independent decision space he has, otherwise we would have d-bus in stable long time ago. Maybe I don't know the process well enough but I would be surprised that Greg can merge something that isn't approved in latest. Fingers crossed it is only 4.19, I am kind of seeing this as a bigger event but I may be wrong.
- ufo 8y agoParent poster was referring to the "LTS" kernels: https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html A good number of Linux distributions are based on an LTS release instead of a mainline release.
- binaryapparatus 8y agoYes, I am aware of that but are LTS kernels in any for different from the mainline kernel? Can LTS kernel contain code that is not approved and tested in mainline first? They are 'older' but they contain same feature set that is already approved by Linus, right?