3 ms·
Looks like this was first posted at Apple Insider on September 29th. That’s a bit more than 3 weeks ago. Is that past the usual embargo period for responsible d
by k_sze 8y ago
Looks like this was first posted at Apple Insider on September 29th. That’s a bit more than 3 weeks ago. Is that past the usual embargo period for responsible disclosure?
- OddEssay 8y agoNone of the articles mentioned actually contacting Apple (unless I missed it) so they appear to have bypassed responsible disclosure and gone straight for personal publicity. It could be they did, and the writers choose not to mention it but the media are usually keen to tag on the "Apple were told about this X days ago" data.