Glad this was posted on HN because Roi's work is outstanding. I see there is a thread about the license here, you know my position. I think in short that: * It

Glad this was posted on HN because Roi's work is outstanding. I see there is a thread about the license here, you know my position. I think in short that: * It makes sense for MongoDB / Redis Labs to change licenses of what they produce if they want / need. * In the case however of the Redis core, it's BSD, no way it will be changed. But for modules produced by Redis Labs, it's their choice and there is something to do against the cloud providers exploit. * I don't like the OSS license + Common Clause combo, but instead I like more to rename the sum of the two, like "Redis Labs Sharing License". We'll see if the company will move in that direction, I'm advising in that way. * I don't like the attempt at getting things like SSPL OSI approved. However, I want to ask if you would be more comfortable if RedisGraph would be licensed under SSPL instead of Apache 2 + Commons Clause. I don't have the power to change the license but I can advise, and for Redis Labs I suspect it is practically the same because the goal is to let users do what they want like-if-it-was-open-source, but stop cloud providers.