3 ms·

This sounds great! Are there any things I need to watch out for before switching from Puma to Falcon? And is it production-ready now, or does it still need some

This sounds great! Are there any things I need to watch out for before switching from Puma to Falcon? And is it production-ready now, or does it still need some time to mature and have feature parity with other web servers? This is a great article about the different Ruby web servers (from 2015): https://www.speedshop.co/2015/07/29/scaling-ruby-apps-to-1000-rpm.html https://www.speedshop.co/2015/07/29/scaling-ruby-apps-to-100... Would be great to have a comparison with Falcon. Also, speaking of performance, I still need to set up jemalloc. Have heard lots of good things about that.

ioquatix 8y ago
I really think it depends on your use-case. The surface area of HTTP is huge. I'd like to think it's production ready, but I'm only just beginning to dog-food Falcon in production on my end. Pragmatically speaking, it will be production ready when it reaches 1.0 - until then, make sure you test it well and keep an eye on how it behaves. I've literally run millions of requests against test servers, but... it's pretty wild out there!