4 ms·

So let's see your search primarily shows two white nationalists, one of whom incites riots were removed based on your search. That's pretty much all your search

So let's see your search primarily shows two white nationalists, one of whom incites riots were removed based on your search. That's pretty much all your search shows with a couple people from Infowars who..wait for it...incite violence against others. I am not shocked that these people were removed.

smsm42 8y ago
If inciting riots were really a problem, I wouldn't see antifa accounts on Twitter. I do see them, I found a dozen of antifa accounts, including Berkeley antifa, notorious for their violent actions. Nobody cares.
- WalterGR 8y ago
  If inciting riots were really a problem, I wouldn't see antifa accounts on Twitter. Please cite antifa accounts on Twitter - not blocked - that are inciting violence. Partisan hand-waving doesn’t fool anyone.
  - smsm42 8y ago
    Antifa perpetrating violence is widely reflected in the press. They are not ashamed of it and not hiding it. They are a violent organization, by principle. Yet, they feel completely comfortable on social media. These are the facts, which are so widely available that if you can not find them without me leading you by hand, you probably won't believe me anyway and find some excuse to dismiss my evidence too - because I can not imagine how otherwise a person who is villing to engage in good faith about the topic can doubt that antifa perpetrates - not just incites in others, but actually doing by itself - violence. > Partisan hand-waving doesn’t fool anyone. That's ok, because there's no purpose to fool anyone. Only to highlight the obvious bias of certain social media platforms, which get triggered by slightest transgression by right wingers and at the same time tolerate virulent haters like Farrakhan and violent organizations like Antifa. These are the facts, you can interpret them as you like.
    - WalterGR 8y ago
      In this thread you’ve haven’t provided a single specific example. If your viewpoint can’t be supported with specifics, then I’m afraid it’s not very compelling.

smsm42 8y ago

If inciting riots were really a problem, I wouldn't see antifa accounts on Twitter. I do see them, I found a dozen of antifa accounts, including Berkeley antifa, notorious for their violent actions. Nobody cares.

WalterGR 8y ago
If inciting riots were really a problem, I wouldn't see antifa accounts on Twitter. Please cite antifa accounts on Twitter - not blocked - that are inciting violence. Partisan hand-waving doesn’t fool anyone.
- smsm42 8y ago
  Antifa perpetrating violence is widely reflected in the press. They are not ashamed of it and not hiding it. They are a violent organization, by principle. Yet, they feel completely comfortable on social media. These are the facts, which are so widely available that if you can not find them without me leading you by hand, you probably won't believe me anyway and find some excuse to dismiss my evidence too - because I can not imagine how otherwise a person who is villing to engage in good faith about the topic can doubt that antifa perpetrates - not just incites in others, but actually doing by itself - violence. > Partisan hand-waving doesn’t fool anyone. That's ok, because there's no purpose to fool anyone. Only to highlight the obvious bias of certain social media platforms, which get triggered by slightest transgression by right wingers and at the same time tolerate virulent haters like Farrakhan and violent organizations like Antifa. These are the facts, you can interpret them as you like.
  - WalterGR 8y ago
    In this thread you’ve haven’t provided a single specific example. If your viewpoint can’t be supported with specifics, then I’m afraid it’s not very compelling.