Alone maybe they are "good stats". The trend doesn't bode well for a sustained livelihood with our planet when fishery stocks are being exploited and depleted a

Alone maybe they are "good stats". The trend doesn't bode well for a sustained livelihood with our planet when fishery stocks are being exploited and depleted at an equal rate. Of the 600 marine fish stocks monitored by FAO: 3% are underexploited 20% are moderately exploited 52% are fully exploited 17% are overexploited 7% are depleted 1% are recovering from depletion Further troubles exist on land, with global deforestation increasing YOY. How will more people living longer benefit from these factors?