The intent is good but I feel this is a pretty futile angle. On an aggregate scale if you don't take authoritarian money, your competitor will and then they wil

The intent is good but I feel this is a pretty futile angle. On an aggregate scale if you don't take authoritarian money, your competitor will and then they will have more money than you. Luckily these days we have a system of checks and balances on authoritarian entities throwing around huge amounts of money to get what they want; it's called democratic government. These days you can help democracy in your own country by working directly on campaign finance reform and voter's rights in your local communities and greater state and federal campaigns. So the people in your government aren't mostly millionaires. That helps. But I've seen first-hand working on these issues that they come off as unsexy and grindy to many.