3 ms·
>It's not alarmism, what I'm saying is that this civilization is unsustainable by any metric you care to throw at it That sounds like alarmism to me. You can
by jacoblyles 16y ago
>It's not alarmism, what I'm saying is that this civilization is unsustainable by any metric you care to throw at it
That sounds like alarmism to me.
You can find examples of writers worrying about running out of the specific resources industry used at the time running back to the 19th century. The modern environmentalist movement has predicted apocalypse like clockwork every ten years dating back to 1960.
The current environmentalist movement is much more well-funded and professional. I guess time will tell if that means they are more accurate.
I'm not familiar with Diamond's book, but it's worth pointing out that the civilizations he examines are at a much earlier phase of technology. Individual differences often confound authors who try to paint historical trends with a broad pen.
- todayiamme 16y agoActually, he backs up his claims with pretty hard data. He draws conclusion from a wide variety of metrics and evidence like core samples, records, tool use, geological standing, possible trade relations, genetic sampling etc. You really need to read him. Check his wikipedia page out ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Diamond http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Diamond ) >>>are at a much earlier phase of technology<<< Ironically, our ancestors said analogous things. Are we truly that different?
- jacoblyles 16y ago>"Ironically, our ancestors said analogous things. Are we truly that different?" The difference between human society before 1800 and today is huge.
- jonhendry 16y agoNevertheless, we can't wish new, needed technology into existence. Sometimes it develops quickly, sometimes it doesn't.