5 ms·
Noob here, when it comes to security and dnssec. Can you provide some information why the article is bad or some other source ? Nothing but for learning purpose
by __Joker 8y ago
Noob here, when it comes to security and dnssec. Can you provide some information why the article is bad or some other source ? Nothing but for learning purpose.
- auslander 8y agoLook at headers. Highly opnionated, not a single pro statement. A good paper discusses all sides of a subject, no cherry picking. For info, wikipedia is a very good starting resource.
- pvg 8y agoA good paper discusses all sides of a subject Not really. There's plenty of good technical and other writing that is one-sided and opinionated, those things are orthogonal to accuracy and quality. It says 'Against DNSSEC' right on the tin.
- auslander 8y ago> good technical and other writing that is one sided and opinionated https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
- pvg 8y agoI don't see how this addresses anything I've said, sorry.
- auslander 8y agoA good research cannot be 'one sided and opinionated' by definition.
- pvg 8y agoWhat definition? The presentation of results (and opinions) can certainly be one-sided and opinionated. There are zillions of super-famous, oft-quoted, endlessly referenced papers, essays, articles, you name it that are one-sided and opinionated. That's a really silly criticism.
- dogecoinbase 8y agoWhy have you failed to address the opposing viewpoint that it can be one-sided? Please stop injecting your personal beliefs into this discussion.
- fosco 8y agoYou might want to review who wrote that article and its purpose. The title conveys what the article is about.... 'Against DNSSEC'