4 ms·
nonsense. author is complaining that the business model of others doesn't align with his need to have the tiniest possible budget and spend the bare minimum on
by jiveturkey 8y ago
nonsense.
author is complaining that the business model of others doesn't align with his need to have the tiniest possible budget and spend the bare minimum on security. boo hoo hoo. if you need sso, suck up the cost and yes, you'll have to pass it on to your customers. if you don't like the pricing model of the saas vendor you're using, how about try to build the service in-house. suddenly you'll realize how cheap even the enterprise offering is.
- eropple 8y agoThe author is not complaining on behalf of his own company, my dude. The author is pointing out a problem that affects everybody else who should be using SSO instead of risking their businesses with shared passwords, YOLO provisioning, and manual offboarding. And those people do not have a budget or a security team. But they probably have Google Apps. SSO is, in 2018, just being decent about security. It is hard enough to operate securely; it is shitty behavior to make it inordinately harder for nontechnical people to do the right thing. (SCIM, however? That's something that directly benefits enterprises who have to operate in bulk.)