3 ms·
not in an attempt to defraud the system but by helping out the neighbors by giving them credit on purchases At this point, he cannot prove that was the case si
by protomyth 8y ago
not in an attempt to defraud the system but by helping out the neighbors by giving them credit on purchases
At this point, he cannot prove that was the case since he doesn't have records of the items purchased. He might be on the side of angels, but he sure is doing everything a scammer would do. Plus, the whole pay next month thing is just fundamentally a problem (what happens if eligibility is lost?) in addition to the treadmill you pointed out.
- geofft 8y ago> Plus, the whole pay next month thing is just fundamentally a problem (what happens if eligibility is lost?) Then the store owner can't cash in the food stamp and has extended credit to the customer, which is a problem for the store owner but not for the food stamp agency. Why should the food stamp agency get involved?
- protomyth 8y agoBecause its specifically is outlawed and the store owner is going to try to collect which is the reason it was outlawed in the first place. There is a long history of people / companies extending credit in a manner that would indenture people to the people / company. See any reference to company stores in the US. That's the environment that the law was setup in.