3 ms·
That’s my point. The child rapist on parole scenario is a straw man. They don’t need breakable encryption to address that problem. Parole requires the parolee t
by CodeWriter23 8y ago
That’s my point. The child rapist on parole scenario is a straw man. They don’t need breakable encryption to address that problem. Parole requires the parolee to sign a contract. Put a no smartphones clause in there and they’re done. Then they can rearrest on that basis alone if he has a smartphone, and let him serve the rest of his original sentence.