3 ms·
I'd say their only problem was : underfunded. All others problems becomes much more easy when you're funded (they say it in the article I think). (and that's w
by wiz21c 8y ago
I'd say their only problem was : underfunded. All others problems becomes much more easy when you're funded (they say it in the article I think).
(and that's why, imho, if you have nobody to give (yep, "give") you the amount of money you need, you'll never ever make it; that's a very unequal world...)
- chiefalchemist 8y agoYes. Ultimely, no funds === "failure." None the less, what I read was someone expecting the process to be easier than a traditional job. If you have less money then time + energy is your next best asset. Sucks. But that's the nature of the beast. I feel for this person(s). But they didn't do their homework. That is on them.
- rossdavidh 8y agoSpeaking of small businesses (I'm married to the founder of one), the number one downfall of small businesses is spending too much money early, when they don't know yet what actually pays back. Getting more funding early, tends to make this problem worse.