> "So it has been almost a decade. How much longer before the whole move semantics addition to the language specification becomes relevant to you?" I'm not deb

> "So it has been almost a decade. How much longer before the whole move semantics addition to the language specification becomes relevant to you?" I'm not debating the usefulness of move semantics. I'm debating the weight being placed on them in these so-called "C++ interview questions". Wouldn't it be better to discuss the actual problem, rather than a concrete solution we ended up having in C++11?