3 ms·
We’re all just spouting anecdata but I agree with walterbell. If someone only has a phone, they’ll go for the largest device possible as it basically fills the
by jorvi 8y ago
We’re all just spouting anecdata but I agree with walterbell.
If someone only has a phone, they’ll go for the largest device possible as it basically fills the role of laptop (‘serious’ stuff), iPad (media consumption) and phone (‘opportunistic’ stuff).
If someone owns a laptop as well, they still ‘need’ a big phone because they’ll use it for a lot of their media consumption.
However, once someone owns an iPad + phone or laptop + iPad + phone, the phone gets relegated to messaging, quick internet searches, transportation and music.
- ghaff 8y agoThere's something to be said for people not buying devices that are too similar in form factor to each other. But I think this tends to better explain why mini tablets aren't especially popular than anything about phone size. Large or small, phones are still a pocketable device that people have with them much of the time. I use my phone a lot for things that I could, in principle, do better on some other device but that other device either doesn't have a cellular connection or it's just not with me--even if it's just up in my office.
- arghwhat 8y agoWhile the logic is sensible, I believe that the phone is the least likely device to be affected. That is, if you have an 12" iPad Pro, you're unlikely to also have a 12" MacBook, as they're devices of similar size and portability, and for "normal" people, also similar capability. However, a phone is a different portability class. You have a phone with you at times where you do not bring an iPad. No amount of devices will help me when I do not have them with me. Even if I am at home, my phone is in my pocket, which an iPad, laptop or desktop never will be. Therefore, I believe that the question is more about preference than about device overlap for phones. But yes, you are right—anecdotes and opinions, rather than data.