Something I am missing here. At the beginning they say spending and the luck of money is not a problem (and with 54K per year per homeless person it sounds plau

Something I am missing here. At the beginning they say spending and the luck of money is not a problem (and with 54K per year per homeless person it sounds plausible) and then at the end they claim the solution would necessarily mean higher taxes. That makes no sense - if money is not the issue, why you'd need higher taxes?