4 ms·
Can you be more specific? Not disagreeing here but genuinely curious what behavior you’re referring to.
by freetime2 8y ago
Can you be more specific? Not disagreeing here but genuinely curious what behavior you’re referring to.
- fossuser 8y agoI'd guess working as an arm of Russian influence in the 2016 election. Wikileaks was originally marketed as a place for people to share documents or whistleblow things like the Snowden revelations. It's since become more of a way to try and hurt the US backed by whoever will support it with Assange giving others plausible deniability/cover.
- cm2187 8y agoI don’t think leaking all of the US diplomatic cables did much in term of whistleblowing, and Snowden did the precise opposite of wikileaks, ie not leak the whole information in bulk to the general public, including information that provides no benefit to the public.