> Either Apple was hacked, they know, and are denying, which is evidence of them being under the thumb of U.S. national security. You'd think the accusers woul

> Either Apple was hacked, they know, and are denying, which is evidence of them being under the thumb of U.S. national security. You'd think the accusers would be able to produce the chip if that were the case. > Or, they were hacked and an internal team knows and Cook doesn't, which is evidence of U.S. national security having powerful influence inside of Apple. More plausible but again - there should be hard evidence of this.