6 ms·
> But "we", who? Patrick Collison, Sam Altman, Marc Benioff, etc, The recommended statement by Wiener addresses this: "A broad-based stakeholder group — includ
by thrmsforbfast 8y ago
> But "we", who? Patrick Collison, Sam Altman, Marc Benioff, etc,
The recommended statement by Wiener addresses this: "A broad-based stakeholder group — including Mayor Ed Lee, then-Supervisor David Chiu, the Controller, the business community, labor, and social service nonprofits..."
Watching Bill Gates try to solve problems in education [1] was a real wake-up call for me. I had a rather involved conversation when the initiative was first announced with an education leader who was deeply suspicious and expected failure (and, what's more, for exactly the reasons that the RAND report identified).
It turns out that, sometimes, leaders who have dedicated their lives to problem X really do know better than people who have succeeded in the business world.
And perhaps more importantly, that more money isn't always a "no downsides" proposition. Big spends on the wrong ideas can suck the air out of the room and divert other resources away from more promising ideas.
But I suspect that the people whose names you mentioned already know that the most effective ideas are probably going to come, in part, from people who have put in their 10,000 hours working on actually solving homelessness.
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-education-initiative-failure-2018-6 https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-melinda-gates-foundatio...
- structural 8y agoThis link posted on HN just yesterday seems to be extremely apropos: https://80000hours.org/articles/accidental-harm/ https://80000hours.org/articles/accidental-harm/ In short, you have to be very careful when you work on hard problems not to divert resources away from other approaches... that might be even more valuable.
- TarpitCarnivore 8y ago> It turns out that, sometimes, leaders who have dedicated their lives to problem X really do know better than people who have succeeded in the business world. I often cringe when I see non-education folks trying to tackle the problem of education in classroms by "automating" or pushing video courses. Solving the issue of education is far more than what's IN the classroom (Here in Jersey we had Abbot districts which gave more to low income schools, it's failed). While supplies are a big problem, more is to do with environment. Having done teaching in a low income district (every single prospective teacher should do this) and an upper middle-class district the difference was stark. I had kids in 1st grade who could not even tie shoes or zipper jackets, let alone have a pencil.