4 ms·

Way back in the day when nobody had heard of Banksy I thought his stenciling was so original and unique. One of the first websites of his I remember him showing

Way back in the day when nobody had heard of Banksy I thought his stenciling was so original and unique. One of the first websites of his I remember him showing how to create stencils, some backstories on his art and how he got them done, etc. It was really cool to have such an inside track with a then very underground scene and artist doing something really original I had never seen. Fast forward 15 years and everything he stood against, everything he mocked, he has now become a part of. The recent Sotheby's shredder stunt is only the most recent example. He took an expensive piece of his own art, and increased the value ten fold by doing what he did. I used to love the guy, now he's just another money grubbing scum who can't seem to get enough of the spotlight.

sarreph 8y ago
> now he's just another money grubbing scum who can't seem to get enough of the spotlight. You clearly have much more of a direct personal experience / knowledge of Banksy's history than I do, but I feel as though he's using the spotlight in order to make a point about how money-hungry the modern art world has become. Yes, you could take the cynical side and assume he really is just doing these 'exposure-stunts' as a way to make more money, but I'd like to believe he still stands for his anti-establishment message. As an aside, I thought much of his art (especially vandalism) doesn't actually belong to him, and he doesn't see the proceeds.
- at-fates-hands 8y ago
  > As an aside, I thought much of his art (especially vandalism) doesn't actually belong to him, and he doesn't see the proceeds. Actually his pieces regularly go up for auction and rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars. Here's a short list of just the most expensive ones to date: https://www.widewalls.ch/10-most-expensive-banksy-artworks-at-auctions/ https://www.widewalls.ch/10-most-expensive-banksy-artworks-a...
lucio 8y ago
It looks like it backfired on him. I don't think it was the intended effect.
- jazzyjackson 8y ago
  You don't think it was the intended effect to make it more expensive? There's a pretty compelling theory that the original wasn't destroyed at all, that the frame is an old magic trick, you roll the painting out of view, and spit a torn up half out the bottom. Did you see the photo Banksy posted of the x-acto blades ? It really is rather nonsensical... [0] Then again, maybe he's playing the long game once people figure out the whole charade is Banksy selling out, the price of his work crashes, thus restoring its purity as self-expression. [0] https://www.boredpanda.com/banksy-painting-girl-with-balloon-shredded-auction-theory/ https://www.boredpanda.com/banksy-painting-girl-with-balloon...
CPLX 8y ago
That’s an odd criticism. The person has completely and totally shunned personal recognition and fame. The temptation to “take off the mask” and bask in the glory has to be totally overwhelming. That’s the most interesting part about all this and the thing that makes me believe the Robert Del Naja theory. I spent a lot of my life around people that are famous or trying to be, it’s an incredible drug. The fact that he’s able to resist it is notable.

sarreph 8y ago

> now he's just another money grubbing scum who can't seem to get enough of the spotlight. You clearly have much more of a direct personal experience / knowledge of Banksy's history than I do, but I feel as though he's using the spotlight in order to make a point about how money-hungry the modern art world has become. Yes, you could take the cynical side and assume he really is just doing these 'exposure-stunts' as a way to make more money, but I'd like to believe he still stands for his anti-establishment message. As an aside, I thought much of his art (especially vandalism) doesn't actually belong to him, and he doesn't see the proceeds.

at-fates-hands 8y ago
> As an aside, I thought much of his art (especially vandalism) doesn't actually belong to him, and he doesn't see the proceeds. Actually his pieces regularly go up for auction and rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars. Here's a short list of just the most expensive ones to date: https://www.widewalls.ch/10-most-expensive-banksy-artworks-at-auctions/ https://www.widewalls.ch/10-most-expensive-banksy-artworks-a...

lucio 8y ago

It looks like it backfired on him. I don't think it was the intended effect.

jazzyjackson 8y ago
You don't think it was the intended effect to make it more expensive? There's a pretty compelling theory that the original wasn't destroyed at all, that the frame is an old magic trick, you roll the painting out of view, and spit a torn up half out the bottom. Did you see the photo Banksy posted of the x-acto blades ? It really is rather nonsensical... [0] Then again, maybe he's playing the long game once people figure out the whole charade is Banksy selling out, the price of his work crashes, thus restoring its purity as self-expression. [0] https://www.boredpanda.com/banksy-painting-girl-with-balloon-shredded-auction-theory/ https://www.boredpanda.com/banksy-painting-girl-with-balloon...

CPLX 8y ago

That’s an odd criticism. The person has completely and totally shunned personal recognition and fame. The temptation to “take off the mask” and bask in the glory has to be totally overwhelming. That’s the most interesting part about all this and the thing that makes me believe the Robert Del Naja theory. I spent a lot of my life around people that are famous or trying to be, it’s an incredible drug. The fact that he’s able to resist it is notable.