3 ms·

I find WSJ's coverage of physics is generally bad. I don't have super concrete examples, but most WSJ quantum articles I read jump right into misconceptions or

I find WSJ's coverage of physics is generally bad. I don't have super concrete examples, but most WSJ quantum articles I read jump right into misconceptions or generalizations to the point of false statements, or are so vague and unnecessary there are not false (or true) statements to be found because it just uses the word quantum a lot and doesn't say anything.

neonate 8y ago
The author won the Nobel Prize in physics.
- chopin 8y ago
  For this, the article is pretty shallow. I noticed the author, dug into the article and was disappointed.
  - neonate 8y ago
    That's a different issue though.