4 ms·
> They are only "forced" if you believe they were originally entitled to live there at a certain price. I’m not opposed to consumer protections here. And not
by drb91 8y ago
> They are only "forced" if you believe they were originally entitled to live there at a certain price.
I’m not opposed to consumer protections here.
And not all old things are good. Hell, the oldest human social institutions are arguably the worst. Do you have an argument for its morality?
- matchbok 8y agoI'm just saying the moving of people throughout cities and neighborhoods is a very natural thing. Someone no longer being able to afford things in their neighborhood is not inherently a bad thing. Responsibly adults should be able to manage their finances, move, and adjust. That's life.