4 ms·
That example does make a very strong case for the feature - which I guess was the point. But, the audience for the post already knows that encrypted SNI is and
by dagenix 8y ago
That example does make a very strong case for the feature - which I guess was the point. But, the audience for the post already knows that encrypted SNI is and why it's important. And if they don't, a much more light-hearted example would do. And it's not like there is much of an anti-encrypted-SNI movement that warrants a powerful response.
So, yeah, I'd agree it seemed both jarring and unnecessary.
- comesee 8y agoYeah not sure why I'm being downvoted. Imagine if the example was HIV.org or ebola.org, totally doesn't seem necessary.
- Simon_says 8y agoYou're being downvoted because your own statement contradicts itself. You're so touchy about the cancer thing that you're complaining about it.
- comesee 8y agoI'm touchy about the cancer thing because I had my leg amputated and went through chemo for a year.
- Simon_says 8y agoGetting agitated over a hypothetical example is a bit of an overreaction.
- dagenix 8y agoI don't know comesee - but their saying it isn't at all hypothetical for them. It's called basic human decency - maybe give it a try?
- dagenix 8y ago> touchy about the cancer thing Wow. That is technically a valid English phrase. What boggles the mind is that someone could be so out of touch with societal norms and basic human decency that they would actually use it.
- dang 8y agoProbably because of the "Shame on Mozilla" bit, which is a trope of the online callout/shaming culture, which we're trying to avoid here. The rest of your comment looks fine to me, and you're obviously speaking from hard experience, which makes comments much more substantive.