3 ms·
> It's really time developers added Adobe to their "friends" list, imo. I'm not a developer. As a user, I'll add Adobe to my "friends" list as soon as they hav
by MikeCapone 16y ago
> It's really time developers added Adobe to their "friends" list, imo.
I'm not a developer. As a user, I'll add Adobe to my "friends" list as soon as they have a decent implementation of Flash for OS X that doesn't take tons of memory and CPU cycles.
Flash is the only thing that can make me restart Chrome because it becomes a resource hog...
- mahmud 16y agoThe research on this has been done, a few years ago, by professors in Ireland and Austria. Adobe is one VM upgrade away from being on-par with Android/Dalvik, SquirrelFish and LuaJit, in terms of performance. Adobe already has the technology to improve performance under their noses, but I don't know what is taking them so long. But I can tell you this: once they implement the already published fixes, you can expect at least 60% performance improvement in Flash player, by my calculations .. -- edit, removed irrelevant facts.
- InclinedPlane 16y agoIn chrome hit shift+esc, find the flash plugin process and hit "end process", it'll restart itself automatically as necessary (you may have to refresh pages hosting flash elements).