3 ms·
I'm concerned mostly with 2, but in small businesses category. Many of them do not have proxy, SSL intercept or MDM (they manage their computers using plain old
by vetinari 8y ago
I'm concerned mostly with 2, but in small businesses category. Many of them do not have proxy, SSL intercept or MDM (they manage their computers using plain old AD, plus some BYOB devices), and having to get one significantly ups the ante for them.
- zamadatix 8y agoThey've always had to get one if they wanted the security/monitoring, this just makes an implementation of how to get around lazy security a standard.
- vetinari 8y agoHowever, neither of them is fully transparent or autoconfigurable, especially for users that roam among networks. Local DNS resolver, while not 100% bulletproof, did the job acceptably.
- dagenix 8y ago> having to get one significantly ups the ante for them. I see this as a good thing. I do sympathize with small businesses that, when gaping holes in internet security are closed, are forced to retire technologies that exploited those holes. And I'm not being sarcastic about being sympathetic - businesses in this position would probably rather be spending their money on something else. But, these are security issues that impact everyone and leaving them unfixed just because it will negatively impact a group isn't a reasonable option.