3 ms·
In some ways that is true, and in others that is not the case. For JSON support, PG really did lead the way as far as RDBMS' go. Things like range types are som
by Tostino 8y ago
In some ways that is true, and in others that is not the case. For JSON support, PG really did lead the way as far as RDBMS' go. Things like range types are something I wish MSSQL supported when I used it at my day job.
- bunderbunder 8y agoAnd plenty more that PostgreSQL will probably lack for the foreseeable future. Especially at the more expensive pricing tiers. But I'm not sure it's a fair comparison, precisely because of that word, "pricing". It's amazing what you can get people to do when you're paying them big bucks to do it. Part of what makes PostgreSQL so impressive is what it does given the budget it's working with.
- riku_iki 8y agoI think they targeted xml instead of json, and much earlier. XML is much more enterprise-ly.