3 ms·
Not to rub it in, but this is one of those cases where a bit of intuition will get you a lot further than a calculation. Is it plausible that a 2 ton vehicle tr
by hugh3 16y ago
Not to rub it in, but this is one of those cases where a bit of intuition will get you a lot further than a calculation. Is it plausible that a 2 ton vehicle travelling at 40 mph is equivalent to 70 kg of TNT?
Think about the damage done by a crashing minivan. Enough to bend some metal, maybe even knock down a small brick wall. But a 70 kg TNT bomb would easily blow the car into many pieces.
Alternatively, how much fuel does it take to accelerate your van from a standstill to 40 mph? A tiny fraction of a litre, which is why you could do it hundreds of times on a tank of gas. Is that tiny fraction of a litre of gasoline going to be energetically equivalent to 70 kg of TNT?
- cabalamat 16y ago> Is it plausible that a 2 ton vehicle travelling at 40 mph is equivalent to 70 kg of TNT? I helps to know that TNT has roughly one tenth the energy density of petrol (4 MJ/kg v. 40 MJ/kg). If it took 7 kg of fuel just to accelerate a vehicle to 40 mph, vehicles would have to carry vastly more fuel than they do.