3 ms·
Reading this, my first thought was that it's certainly nice that Heathrow Terminal 5 has faster than normal baggage reclaim and smoother security procedures, an
by Toucan 16y ago
Reading this, my first thought was that it's certainly nice that Heathrow Terminal 5 has faster than normal baggage reclaim and smoother security procedures, and that Calgary International Airport has free wi-fi outside the Tim Hortons, but it's never going to sway my decision. If I have to travel by air, I have to travel by air.
Then I actually thought about recent times I've travelled by plane and I realised that competition does exist in London at least. I have:
Spent £50 more (a 70% fare increase) to fly to and from London City Airport. LCY is smaller and as such seems to be much more efficiently run. There's no long walk/shuttle between security and the gate. Security takes all of 5 minutes at most. The check-in desks have no or very short queues and there's seating nearby if you do have to wait. It's closer to the city centre so there's a 20 minute transfer instead of an hour long transfer between the airport and London. This extra expenditure netted me a nicer airline as well, but the main justification was the airport. About £20 of the cost was mitigated by not having to travel to another airport on the outskirts of London (with the exception of the ~£8 journey to and from Heathrow)
Spent £50 more (a 10% fare increase) to fly to and from London Heathrow Terminal 5. The terminal opened in 2008 and is very modern. Baggage reclaim seems faster than other airports I've visited, the overall layout is more sane and security tends to move quite fast for an international airport. It's certainly worth a little extra in my opinion.
There's room for improvement. I still prefer the 4 hr 30 train journey from London to Edinburgh v. the similar priced 1 hr plane journeys. Air travel might win if it can beat the convenience of just turning up at the train station 20 minutes before the train leaves, only paying a small extra fee if I want the freedom of using any train that day instead of a specific train and compete with the fact that the train stations are in city centres, whereas the airports are on city outskirts. These problems are quite hard or impossible to solve, so it's going to have to try harder in other ways. Oh, and the trains have (somewhat spotty in parts) wifi as well.
- com 16y agoI know what you mean about LCY - just a pleasure to use. It's a pain if you have to head over to say, Richmond or Ruislip, but for the centre or east of London, it's a dream. I choose it every time I go to London (which is always short-haul). I also choose to travel Porter whenever it's possible when I'm going to or leaving Toronto - Toronto City airport is incrediby central (less than 1km from the central business district?), with added bonus 2 minute ferry ride from the city to the dinky little island. Long haul from Europe into South-East Asia or the South Pacific/Australia from Europe, there is almost always a plane change. Choosing between Dubai, HK, KL, Bangkok or Singapore is a no-brainer: Changi is hands-down winner. Long waits are handily dealt with by the free city tour or the short MRT trip into town to pop into Little India or Chinatown or the malls, or the beach or ... Airport facilities are generally awesome, especially the (groundside) basement Hawker food hall in the fourth sub-basement of Terminal 3. I love the rooftop pool on Terminal 1. And SQ is a good reason to choose Changi all on its own. So yeah, I choose airports and airlines based on facilities and pleasure of use. For long-haul the differences can be a matter of only a couple of Euros, but the difference in the experience, the amount of saved time etc is significant. Decent TGV services mean than I haven't had to use the god-awful CDG place for many years. I hope the same sorts of services will be implemented in the UK at some point.