3 ms·
> Yes, I have a better explanation for the marks. One that does not involve magical tetrapods digging in narrow spaces with unlimited degrees of rotation in the
by LaGrange 8y ago
> Yes, I have a better explanation for the marks. One that does not involve magical tetrapods digging in narrow spaces with unlimited degrees of rotation in the shoulder.
Truly, please provide it to me. I hope you've come up with something that doesn't lead to an alternative history where it's the Aztecs colonising Spain.
- pvaldes 8y ago> please provide it to me Of course I'll do. By third time: hu-man mi-ners
- LaGrange 8y agoThat doesn't sound like an explanations for the marks. I even gave you a hint why.
- PhasmaFelis 8y agoIs there something comparative, perhaps based on the width, depth, texture, or curve of the marks, that your expertise in this field leads you to conclude that these are, incontrovertibly, tool marks rather than claw marks? Or you just going by "gut feeling" and don't have any actual proof?
- LaGrange 8y agoI mean, we all know that our Aztec oppressors had iron pickaxes in 10000BC.
- saalweachter 8y agoI mean, you punch a couple of trees and you can make a pickaxe with just wood easy-peasy. You can’t mine ores with it but it will get you through stone at least.
- dkersten 8y agoPlease back up your claims with evidence.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- DonHopkins 8y agoYou sound Ferengi. Is your universal translator broken? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w7JrSPc5WY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w7JrSPc5WY