I think tech people should stand up against this rhetoric. Gaming is a harmless activity and "ruining someone's fun" is no reason to employ laws that were desig

I think tech people should stand up against this rhetoric. Gaming is a harmless activity and "ruining someone's fun" is no reason to employ laws that were designed to prevent serious physical, irrevocable harm to humans. What was the judge thinking here? The virtual world is not directly analogous to the real one, and the law should be applied differently. Also , "breaking into" the game is a very GTAV thing to do