3 ms·
"The issue here is should somebody be completely destroyed for a difference of opinion?" Calling it a "difference of opinion" is really masking the entire thin
by s73v3r_ 8y ago
"The issue here is should somebody be completely destroyed for a difference of opinion?"
Calling it a "difference of opinion" is really masking the entire thing. He was saying that, not only are LGBT people not deserving of the same rights that he had, but that we should be able to vote on what rights they have. Can you see how dehumanizing that is?
And I cannot take your bit about "tolerance" seriously when we're talking about someone who, themselves, was not showing any kind of tolerance.
- austincheney 8y agoTolerance is appreciation of disagreement, so it really seems that you are misusing that term to qualify something not stated.
- s73v3r_ 8y agoAgain, I find it insane that you are calling someone saying that a group of people are not entitled to basic human rights and dignity a "disagreement". You have disagreements over what pizza toppings to get, not if you are allowed to decide if two people in love are allowed to marry.