"What law are they breaking?" is the important question to ask here, and I don't have a good answer. I'm not familiar with Australian law, and none of the artic

"What law are they breaking?" is the important question to ask here, and I don't have a good answer. I'm not familiar with Australian law, and none of the articles about this seem to have done their due diligence in that respect. I assume that's why they all led with "homes raided" and "funds frozen", since otherwise there'd be no story yet. For example: "Team of 5 sued in court over creating and selling a video game cheating tool to thousands of players" Is this interesting? Absolutely. Does it have the same emotional 'clickbait' hook as this? "Team of 5 have funds frozen before they get a chance to respond to allegations" Or the actual headline here? "GTA 'cheats' home raided" Not even slightly. Don't let a newspaper headline frame the issue for you. The issue here is simple: "Is it legal, under Australian law, to sell software that violates the terms of service of an online service only when executed by the buyer?"