> They freeze the money in case you're guilty and try to run with it. If you're found innocent, you'll regain access. this is the exact opposite of basis on wh

> They freeze the money in case you're guilty and try to run with it. If you're found innocent, you'll regain access. this is the exact opposite of basis on which most legal systems are based on - innocence until proven guilty. > If your objection is that freezing their assets is inhumane, that's incorrect. no, that's their opinion. one i agree with. you can disagree with both of us, but that too is also just your opinion. > ... granted a reasonable stipend that is also your opinion, and also varies heavily based on what you mean by "reasonable" > ... for the duration of the case. and what if it takes two years? be reasonable here. rockstar have made an immense amount of money from the GTA franchise. rockstar probably incur more financial damage from floating point rounding error. the actions taken by the australian court system (one known for its.. reasonable decisions RE gaming) are catastrophically disproportionate.