10 ms·
I'm not defending Rockstar here but it sounds to me that they shouldn't have to spend resources just because some random people decided to create cheats. I muc
by taytus 8y ago
I'm not defending Rockstar here but it sounds to me that they shouldn't have to spend resources just because some random people decided to create cheats.
I much rather have them developing more content/games.
- ilikehurdles 8y agoI take it your webservers have no csrf protection, run on unencrypted http, pass passwords in plaintext over basic auth, run with root-level permissions on hardware, and haven't been updated ever.
- taytus 8y agoWhat do you want to achieve with this comment? I honestly don't get it.
- jessaustin 8y agoObviously Rockstar had to devote some resources to this question, otherwise developing cheats would be so easy no one would bother to buy them. Rockstar think they've spent enough, so now it's on the Australian courts to spend Australian public resources on this vitally important Australian public interest. One doubts that a developer of e.g. educational software could expect such generous treatment.
- Nasrudith 8y agoThey don't have to do anything technically - they are free to leave the game Goat Simulator buggy or turn the next one into a kitten petting simulator. But there are consequences for that. As long as they care about quality or at least success providing support and properly setting access permissions and securing their architecture to not do things like trust the client is important.
- honkycat 8y agoI'll add that it's not just some random people, they have a company and a SAAS product they provide and make a profit out of.