4 ms·
No offense, but given that you are making a product that has a much higher potential to enable bad actors than usual, isn't it kind of you/your company's job to
by heartles 8y ago
No offense, but given that you are making a product that has a much higher potential to enable bad actors than usual, isn't it kind of you/your company's job to try to solve it?
EDIT: Just realized I responded to the wrong person :(
- jhabdas 8y agoNo, it's not. In fact it's your job to try and police yourself. But you probably on someone else to control you don't you?
- heartles 8y agoI mean, my thought is that if a high volume of spam causes other email servers to block Helm, then it makes it unusable to the good actors in the system. I didn't see the CEO address this. Or, maybe I just misunderstand smtp idk
- graybolt 8y agoYeah, that's how I understand the issue too. I don't think there's an easy way to do things, either you end up blocking some people with a legitimate use case or you end up becoming a spam farm.
- mrunkel 8y agoThe person you are replying too isn't the CEO. Just another new user (that's why the username is in green).
- heartles 8y agoYou learn something new every day, I always assumed the green meant OP, like how reddit uses blue. I didn't even notice the change in username Thanks!
- diegoperini 8y agoThanks for teaching!
- throwanem 8y agoSpammers can already get mail servers without a problem. This doesn’t make that easier, because it’s already as easy as it can be.