The reference manual seems to need some love: https://pijul.org/manual/reference/log.html https://pijul.org/manual/reference/log.html Is it pijul log or pijul

The reference manual seems to need some love: https://pijul.org/manual/reference/log.html https://pijul.org/manual/reference/log.html Is it pijul log or pijul changes? Also I see a huge block of ~30 nested blockquotes below the "Usage" title that probably shouldn't be there. https://pijul.org/manual/reference/patch.html https://pijul.org/manual/reference/patch.html The subtitle "Output the compressed encoding of a patch (in binary)" seems misleading, since that only describes "pijul patch --bin"? Why is "pijul record" not called "commit" instead? That's the equivalent, right? It seems all other commands have very familiar names, but this one is just different to be different? https://pijul.org/manual/getting_started.html#definitions https://pijul.org/manual/getting_started.html#definitions Same for "a pristine, which is a representation of the current recorded version of the repository". What's the "normal" word for that? The definition doesn't really make sense to me. https://pijul.org/community/ https://pijul.org/community/ The "Getting started" section contains no information about how to get started. Why no link to https://pijul.org/manual/getting_started.html https://pijul.org/manual/getting_started.html?