4 ms·
I wouldn't say that nothing has changed but nothing has occurred like what anti-cannabis activists claimed would happen. One outcome that gets mentioned is tha
by wavefunction 8y ago
I wouldn't say that nothing has changed but nothing has occurred like what anti-cannabis activists claimed would happen.
One outcome that gets mentioned is that vehicular accidents increased in Colorado following legalization but the population growth outpaced the relative growth in accidents, meaning per-capita vehicular accidents actually fell.
Some data on cannabis and accident rates: https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/evaluating-research-marijuana-legalization-traffic-accidents.pdf https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/evaluating-res...
- dsfyu404ed 8y agoOn a state (or country) level the increase in car crashes (only a small fraction of which will cause harm to people) is nothing compared to the negative side effects of criminalizing possession of weed. Decriminalizing drugs is a massive net win from a societal point of view even though there are negative side effects.
- modoc 8y agoWouldn't that mean that while many people moved to Colorado (some presumably for the weed) vehicle accident rates fell after legalization? The way you word it seems to imply that weed led to more accidents, and the incoming people "covered it up" statistically, but that doesn't seem to be the simplest read of the numbers.