> I've largely given up on predicting what works here. I have essentially zero ability to do that. That's part of what makes it fun, at least when it's general

> I've largely given up on predicting what works here. I have essentially zero ability to do that. That's part of what makes it fun, at least when it's general randomness that pulls really interesting people into the discussion :) > Most likely, the two things were not specifically intended to disenfranchise Native voters. Neither taken alone is malicious. Taken together, the outcome is de facto disenfranchisement. I think that would have been an interesting discussion, if it could have avoided devolving into political tribalism. Your guess is as good as mine as to whether it could have. I will say it's interesting to be early in a submission that slightly contentious and to help or see some early comments steered or redirected usefully, and see an article that spent a few minutes flagged come back to life.