5 ms·
I'm not sure if this is a puff piece or an ad disguised as an article, but it is quite fluffy. A more apt title would have been 'Chuchu TV is pretty great, but
by culot 8y ago
I'm not sure if this is a puff piece or an ad disguised as an article, but it is quite fluffy.
A more apt title would have been 'Chuchu TV is pretty great, but could it be greater?'
- dang 8y agoThat's a bit unfair, but you're right that "Raised by YouTube" is not a good title for this profile. We've changed the title to use more representative language from the article.
- pvg 8y agoWeren't your criteria 'not misleading or clickbait'? This doesn't seem to be either. 'Good' opens an even bigger can of worms of title bickering.
- dang 8y agoThe title was misleading. The article is a company profile.
- pvg 8y agoIt's a 7k-word piece in the print edition of the Atlantic. You've made the case yourself that titles don't have to be trivially revealing - presumably because 'intellectual curiosity' necessarily involves some actual curiosity. 'Raised on Youtube' might be imperfect on some parameter or another but it's not 'misleading' any more than, I dunno, 'The Power Broker' is a misleading title of a biography. The title it's been replaced with is literalist butchery.