4 ms·
The only objective definition of Open Source I know of is OSI's. Everything else is a hodge-podge of whatever the user of the word feels it's open. Is it readin
by icebraining 8y ago
The only objective definition of Open Source I know of is OSI's. Everything else is a hodge-podge of whatever the user of the word feels it's open. Is it reading the code? Modifying it? Redistributing it? There's no consensus besides OSI.
- MrStonedOne 8y agoBut their definition does not restrict it to OSI approved licenses, so their assertion its not open source because it hasn't been approved is not valid.